India's Roadmap to 100 GW of Hydro Pumped Storage: A Critical Pillar for Energy Transition

Hydro Pumped Storage Projects (PSPs) represent a mature and proven technology for large-scale energy storage, functioning essentially as giant batteries that store excess electricity by pumping water uphill and release it to generate power during peak demand. In the context of India's ambitious renewable energy goals, PSPs are indispensable for grid stability, integrating variable renewables like solar and wind, and ensuring reliable power supply. The Central Electricity Authority (CEA) has outlined a comprehensive roadmap aiming to achieve 100 GW of PSP capacity by 2035-36, aligning with India's Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) under the Paris Agreement to reduce emissions intensity and reach net-zero by 2070. This article analyzes the roadmap's key elements, drawing from official reports and related studies, while incorporating international comparisons and assessing reliability and viability in the Indian context.

Understanding Hydro Pumped Storage Technology

PSPs operate in two modes: pumping (charging) and generating (discharging). During off-peak hours, surplus electricity pumps water from a lower reservoir to an upper one. When demand peaks, water flows back down through turbines to generate electricity. There are two main types: open-loop (connected to natural water flows) and closed-loop (independent of natural flows, minimizing environmental impact).

This technology boasts high efficiency (70-80% round-trip), long lifespan (over 50 years), and scalability, making it superior to batteries for long-duration storage. In India, PSPs are particularly vital as the country targets 500 GW of non-fossil capacity by 2030, where intermittency poses a major challenge.

Current Status of PSPs in India

As of 2026, India has an installed PSP capacity of approximately 4.75-7 GW across nine operational plants, with an additional 2.78 GW under construction and 29.93 GW allotted for development. The total identified potential stands at 267 GW, comprising 58 GW on-stream (using existing rivers) and 209 GW off-stream (closed-loop). Key operational projects include Kadana (240 MW) in Gujarat and Tehri (1,000 MW) in Uttarakhand. However, development has lagged due to high upfront costs, long gestation periods (5-15 years), and regulatory hurdles.

Comparatively, India's current capacity is modest against global leaders, highlighting the urgency of the roadmap.

The Roadmap to 100 GW: Objectives and Phases

The CEA's "Roadmap to 100 GW of Hydro Pumped Storage Projects by 2035-36" identifies over 120 potential sites with a combined potential exceeding 180 GW. The target is to commission 100 GW by 2035-36, supporting India's energy transition by providing 62 GW of storage by 2029-30 and 161 GW by 2034-35 to integrate renewables.

Key Phases and Strategies

• Short-term (up to 2027): Focus on expediting clearances for 27 allotted projects (29.93 GW) and initiating surveys for new sites. Emphasize public-private partnerships (PPPs) and viability gap funding (VGF).

• Medium-term (2028-2032): Scale up to 50 GW, prioritizing off-stream projects for faster implementation (2-year licensing). Integrate with the National Electricity Plan, targeting 26.7 GW PSPs and 47.2 GW battery storage by 2032.

• Long-term (2033-2036): Achieve the full 100 GW, with cumulative investments of Rs 5-6 lakh crore (about $60-72 billion).

The roadmap lists indicative sites across states like Maharashtra (multiple projects totaling over 20 GW), Andhra Pradesh, and Mizoram. Developers such as NHPC, THDCIL, and SJVNL are key players.

Challenges in Implementation

Despite the potential, several barriers persist:

• Environmental and Regulatory: PSPs face cumbersome environmental clearances, treated similarly to conventional hydro despite lower impacts (minimal displacement, no large submergence in off-stream designs). Recommendations include categorizing off-stream PSPs separately for faster approvals.

• Financial: High capital costs ($2,200-2,600/kW for 10-hour storage) and long payback periods deter investors. The roadmap suggests waivers on inter-state transmission charges, tax incentives, and market-based procurement.

• Technological and Geological: Underground powerhouses and tunnel boring require advanced tech; geology characterization is costly.

• Social: Limited R&R issues but potential local opposition in hilly areas.

Policy and Financial Recommendations

The Ministry of Power's guidelines promote PSPs through:

• Exempting free power obligations (unlike conventional hydro).

• Resource adequacy planning incorporating storage.

• Incentives like ISTS charge waivers and VGF for viability.

Financing could involve green bonds, multilateral funding (e.g., World Bank), and PPPs. The levelized cost of storage for PSPs is projected at $0.05/kWh by 2030 with innovations.

International Perspectives

Globally, PSPs constitute 93% of utility-scale storage, with 160 GW installed as of 2020. China leads with 50.6 GW, targeting 120 GW by 2030, driven by policies like NEA guidelines and investments in compressed air storage. The US has 21.9 GW, with a pipeline of 72.6 GW, focusing on modular designs and closed-loop systems for quicker deployment. Europe, with 50 GW, emphasizes hybrid projects and innovations like underwater PSPs.

India can learn from China's policy-driven scale-up and the US's R&D in cost reductions (e.g., 3D printing for components). However, India's focus on off-stream sites aligns with global trends toward lower-impact designs.

Reliability and Viability in India

Reliability

PSPs offer unmatched reliability for grid balancing, with quick ramp-up (minutes) and long-duration storage (6-20 hours), far surpassing batteries (0.25-4 hours). In India, where peak demand often exceeds 240 GW and renewables fluctuate, PSPs can mitigate blackouts, as seen in the 2022 heatwave. They provide ancillary services like frequency control and black-start capability, essential for a renewable-heavy grid. With cycle life exceeding 10,000 and minimal degradation, PSPs ensure long-term dependability.

Viability

Economically, PSPs are viable with levelized costs lower than batteries ($50-150/kWh vs. $100-300/kWh for Li-ion). In India, supportive policies (e.g., no free power, tax breaks) enhance bankability. Environmentally, closed-loop PSPs have low footprints, aligning with sustainability goals. However, viability hinges on resolving clearances and securing investments; delays could inflate costs by 20-30%. Analytically, PSPs are more viable than BESS for durations >4 hours, but hybrid systems (PSPs + batteries) could optimize costs. Overall, with projected RE growth to 701 GW by 2035, PSPs are not just viable but essential for energy security.

Conclusion

The CEA's roadmap positions PSPs as a cornerstone of India's net-zero journey, addressing intermittency and fostering sustainable growth. While challenges like regulations and financing loom, international successes and domestic innovations offer a path forward. Achieving 100 GW by 2035-36 will require concerted efforts from government, industry, and financiers. If realized, it could transform India's power sector, ensuring reliable, affordable clean energy for billions.

 #PSP , #Storage, #NetZero, #100GWPSP, #RenewableEnergyChronicles , #RESI